Skip to content

GOATS-1015 GOATS-1045: UI: Static scheduling window form layout; #505

Merged
miguelgomezgomez merged 3 commits intomainfrom
GOATS-1015/Static-scheduling-window-form-layout
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

GOATS-1015 GOATS-1045: UI: Static scheduling window form layout; #505
miguelgomezgomez merged 3 commits intomainfrom
GOATS-1015/Static-scheduling-window-form-layout

Conversation

@miguelgomezgomez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@miguelgomezgomez miguelgomezgomez commented Nov 26, 2025

Checklist

  • Added a release note in doc/changes using the PR number.

@miguelgomezgomez miguelgomezgomez force-pushed the GOATS-1015/Static-scheduling-window-form-layout branch 3 times, most recently from 8c16e76 to cbabeda Compare November 27, 2025 20:04
@miguelgomezgomez miguelgomezgomez marked this pull request as draft November 27, 2025 20:05
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@davner davner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! My only comment is that the readonly flag is no longer needed as it was decided we didn't need to be able to toggle the widgets to enable or disable them.

@miguelgomezgomez miguelgomezgomez changed the title GOATS-1015: UI: Static scheduling window form layout GOATS-1015 GOATS-1045: UI: Static scheduling window form layout; Dec 2, 2025
@miguelgomezgomez miguelgomezgomez force-pushed the GOATS-1015/Static-scheduling-window-form-layout branch 2 times, most recently from 8d4767a to a20466d Compare December 2, 2025 19:12
@miguelgomezgomez miguelgomezgomez marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2025 19:13
@miguelgomezgomez miguelgomezgomez merged commit f572974 into main Dec 2, 2025
1 check passed
@miguelgomezgomez miguelgomezgomez deleted the GOATS-1015/Static-scheduling-window-form-layout branch December 2, 2025 19:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants